土曜日, 7月 08, 2006

Elvis Diplomacy

Gomen nasai, I've still no time to blog. I'm in Finland. I was very impressed with Jun-chan's diplomatic skills last week, though: Elvis Diplomacy is obviously simple enough to keep GWB (aka 'the Decider') "happii".
See below for an article on how the Decider and Jun-chan make a huge deal out of the DPRK missiles that refuse to fly anywhere near Japan nor the U.S.

Japan must lobby U.S. to talk directly with Pyongyang
07/07/2006BY MASARU HONDA, ASAHI SHIMBUN


The multiple missile firings Wednesday by North Korea shattered Pyongyang's moratorium on such launches. The moratorium on North Korea's nuclear weapons development has already broken down.
In the worst-case scenario, the six-party talks, which could develop into a framework for regional security, could be the next to go.
For the time being, Japan and the United States plan to tighten the noose around North Korea, mainly through the United Nations Security Council.
However, gaining the total cooperation of China and Russia--two key players on the council as well as the six-party talks--will not be easy.
The policy of setting moratoriums on North Korea's nuclear weapons and missile development programs was an initiative of the administration of U.S. President Bill Clinton.
After the nuclear crisis that emerged on the Korean Peninsula in 1994, the United States and North Korea signed the Agreed Framework in 1994. That agreement was supposed to have prevented North Korea from producing plutonium for nuclear warheads.
Following the launch of the Taepodong-1 ballistic missile in 1998, William Perry, a former U.S. defense secretary, visited North Korea and reached a deal in which Pyongyang agreed to freeze missile launches in exchange for continued assistance.
However, the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush suspected that North Korea was secretly planning to produce weapons-grade material through uranium enrichment.
The Agreed Framework was no longer functional, and North Korea began openly manufacturing plutonium. In 2005, Pyongyang announced that it possessed nuclear weapons.
In Perry's view, North Korea has produced enough plutonium since 2003 for six to eight nuclear warheads.
Although the North Korean threat has grown, the Bush administration has rejected bilateral negotiations with Pyongyang.
Instead, the United States started up the six-party talks by bringing in China, which has influence over North Korea. Last fall, a joint statement was released after the six-party talks that called on North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons development plan.
However, Washington got fed up with North Korea's covert activities, including the counterfeiting of U.S. currency, and imposed economic sanctions. That led to greater mistrust between the United States and North Korea.
Feeling cornered, Pyongyang lashed out by launching seven missiles on Wednesday.
North Korea's offensive capability will obviously heighten immensely if its nuclear weapons development program is tied in with its missile program. Japan and the United States are planning to work together on a missile defense system to counter such a threat.
But there are clear indications that Tokyo and Washington had different views of the crisis created by Wednesday's launches.
The U.S. government focused on the launch of the Taepodong-2, which is said to be capable of reaching the U.S. mainland. The test of the Taepodong-2 apparently failed Wednesday, and Stephen Hadley, national security adviser to Bush, said the launch was not a direct threat to the United States.
But the Japanese government could not give its public such reassurances. At least two of the missiles were the Nodong, which has a range that covers almost the entire Japanese archipelago.
If Pyongyang should succeed in producing nuclear warheads for its missiles, the likely first target would not be the United States, but Japan.
One reason the crisis has deepened is inconsistency in the Bush administration's policy toward North Korea. There was a period when Washington was more concerned about a regime change in North Korea than Pyongyang's nuclear weapons and missile development programs.
If, as in the past, Tokyo decides on its response after waiting to see what the Bush administration does, it could actually worsen the situation and go against this country's interests.
With Japan's top priority being a resolution of the crisis over nuclear weapons and missiles, Tokyo should lobby the Bush administration to enter into direct dialogue with North Korea while maintaining the six-party talks, which will be key to future security in East Asia.
Even if the issue is being taken up at the U.N. Security Council, it will be difficult to bring peace to the region unless Japan takes such a fundamental stance.(IHT/Asahi: July 7,2006)


Check me out!

Powered by Blogger

I would've been a Nazi Swine
Achtung! You are 38% brainwashworthy, 50% antitolerant, and 19% blindly patriotic
Sie sind ein Schwein! You would've lived a quiet and consenting civilian life in Germany, while the Nazis stomped all over people you didn't quite care about.

You would never have directly joined the Nazis, basically because (1) you're not so nationalistic, (2) you're not that susceptible to crazy propaganda, and (3) you probably don't have the bloodlust. But you would've appreciated the Party, because you liked how they cleaned out the [insert race you dislike here].

The fact is, you demonstrate too much attachment to and pride of your own kind, be they white & male & straight or whatever. You absolutely would not have stood up to the Germans.

Conclusion: born and raised in Germany in the early 1930's, you would NOT have STOOD UP to the Nazis. Sorry



<



My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 44% on brainwashworthy
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 91% on antitolerant
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 22% on patriotic
Link: The Would You Have Been a Nazi Test written by jason_bateman on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test
The Wild Rose
Random Brutal Love Dreamer (RBLD)

shmolorful, but unpicked. You are The Wild Rose.

Prone to bouts of cynicism, sarcasm, and thorns, you excite a certain kind of man. Hoping to gather you up, he flirts and winks and asks you out, ultimately professing his love. Then you make him bleed. Why? Because you're the rare, independent, self-sufficient kind of woman who does want love, but not from a weakling.

You don't seem to take yourself too seriously, and that's refreshing. You aren't uptight; you don't over-plan. Romance-wise, sex isn't a top priority--a true relationship would be preferable. For your age, you haven't had a lot of bonafide love experience, though, and this kind of gets to core of the issue. You're very selective.

Your exact female opposite:
The Dirty Little Secret

Deliberate Gentle Sex Master
The problem is them, not you, right? You have lofty standards that few measure up to. You're out there all right, but not to be picked up by just anyone.


"You're never truly single as long as you have yourself."

ALWAYS AVOID: The Bachelor (DGSM)

CONSIDER: The Vapor Trail (RBLM).


Link: The Online Dating Persona Test @ OkCupid - free online dating.
If I was a country, I'd be Canada!
Your country is 56 concerned with morals, 57 prosperous, 58 liberal, and 30 aggressive! You're a charitable country with a soft spot for mounties. Don't plan on invading anyone anytime soon, but be happy--life's good and people everywhere enjoy a welfare state.

Vous êtes un pays charitable avec un endroit doux pour mounties. Pas le projet sur envahir n'importe qui n'importe quand bientôt, mais être heureux -- vie bonne et gens apprécient partout un Etat-providence.

For your information, the possible countries in this test include: Haiti, North Korea, Albania, Russia, Vietnam, Turkey, Poland, India, Singapore, China, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Libya, Tanzania, East Timor, Lithuania, Indonesia, Iran, Canada, Israel, Sweden, Australia, Germany, or the United States of America.




My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 59% on morals
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 36% on prosperity
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 49% on liberalness
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 12% on aggression
Link: The What country are you? Test written by cactusoftheeast on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test
< hit counters
Dell Coupons