月曜日, 3月 12, 2007

IT'S QUESTION TIME

Back in the book of the living, as those who watched Question Time last Thursday might have noticed. No, Miriam is not a pseudonym for Margaret Hodge, nor Pierce Morgan, for that matter: I was merely in the audience, but I had my say. Please read my post before you watch my performance here (link to full programme, but I comment on the first question. It's available until Thursday, 15.3).
I commented on the panel's comments on Cameron being a 'good leader' by firing Mercer. My comment was not well formed, and I still cringe thinking about it. From the comfortable armchair of hindsight there were a million ways I could have sharpened my point of view into a deadly, stabbing tool rather than that bland, whingey piece of poo I ended up throwing at the panel.
I hadn't read the papers that day, so I had no idea someone had been fired for allegedly racist comments. What prompted me to comment was the overly politically correct stance of the panel. What is overlooked is the fact that a huge proportion of people, army personnel or otherwise, don't think their racist views are wrong in any way. How do you go about changing that? Contrary to what Pierce Morgan said on QT, what goes on in the barracks and elsewhere is precisely the point of this whole debate. My comment was rubbish, but I have to say I was equally dissappointed by the silly, PC, and politician-centered views of everyone on the panel.

Cameron was perhaps a good leader for firing Mercer, but he was a 'good leader' in a way that befits a politician. I don't think firing a mere messenger was quite the right thing to do. I think Mercer should have had the chance to explain his views, not necessarily as a way of apology, but to explain what he knows and thinks of the racial divides as he has himself experienced and witnessed them before being fired under pressure from the press and political adversaries. I would welcome a non-London based discussion on public opinions with people who actually hold these banned opinions. They are many.
I witness crap like this all the time. Just the other day a guy came over to fix our chairs and mentioned how he couldn't stand pakis. I was mortified, but this wasn't the first time I've heard stuff like this. Will I report this guy to the landlord for being racist? Well, no. What good would it do? He'll be the same man with the same opinions, if somewhat more bitter if he got fired for his views.
This is the worrying bit: Politicians are asked to do the 'right thing' in every way, but no-one ever asks who defines 'right' and 'wrong' nowadays. Although politicians are really quite benign creatures (really), they operate in an environment that is relentless to any faults, and it takes a hell of a lot to keep your wits in that kind of a side-wind. But why are politicians so scared of being, well, human?
Is it Westminster? Fleet Street? The Red Tops? The Guardian? (okay, that last suggestion was NOT a joke). Please do not let your MP fall into the PC trap.


Few people here initially realise I'm foreign. It's usually about 10 minutes into a conversation before they pick up on the foreign in my high pitched and weirdly nasal southern posh-ish accent (I've heard it myself on QT now... ) and my patchy cultural knowledge, and even then (and I'm never too sure how much emphasis to put on these things), I'm white, but I'm not Polish. That, apparently, is a good thing.


Check me out!

Powered by Blogger

I would've been a Nazi Swine
Achtung! You are 38% brainwashworthy, 50% antitolerant, and 19% blindly patriotic
Sie sind ein Schwein! You would've lived a quiet and consenting civilian life in Germany, while the Nazis stomped all over people you didn't quite care about.

You would never have directly joined the Nazis, basically because (1) you're not so nationalistic, (2) you're not that susceptible to crazy propaganda, and (3) you probably don't have the bloodlust. But you would've appreciated the Party, because you liked how they cleaned out the [insert race you dislike here].

The fact is, you demonstrate too much attachment to and pride of your own kind, be they white & male & straight or whatever. You absolutely would not have stood up to the Germans.

Conclusion: born and raised in Germany in the early 1930's, you would NOT have STOOD UP to the Nazis. Sorry



<



My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 44% on brainwashworthy
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 91% on antitolerant
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 22% on patriotic
Link: The Would You Have Been a Nazi Test written by jason_bateman on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test
The Wild Rose
Random Brutal Love Dreamer (RBLD)

shmolorful, but unpicked. You are The Wild Rose.

Prone to bouts of cynicism, sarcasm, and thorns, you excite a certain kind of man. Hoping to gather you up, he flirts and winks and asks you out, ultimately professing his love. Then you make him bleed. Why? Because you're the rare, independent, self-sufficient kind of woman who does want love, but not from a weakling.

You don't seem to take yourself too seriously, and that's refreshing. You aren't uptight; you don't over-plan. Romance-wise, sex isn't a top priority--a true relationship would be preferable. For your age, you haven't had a lot of bonafide love experience, though, and this kind of gets to core of the issue. You're very selective.

Your exact female opposite:
The Dirty Little Secret

Deliberate Gentle Sex Master
The problem is them, not you, right? You have lofty standards that few measure up to. You're out there all right, but not to be picked up by just anyone.


"You're never truly single as long as you have yourself."

ALWAYS AVOID: The Bachelor (DGSM)

CONSIDER: The Vapor Trail (RBLM).


Link: The Online Dating Persona Test @ OkCupid - free online dating.
If I was a country, I'd be Canada!
Your country is 56 concerned with morals, 57 prosperous, 58 liberal, and 30 aggressive! You're a charitable country with a soft spot for mounties. Don't plan on invading anyone anytime soon, but be happy--life's good and people everywhere enjoy a welfare state.

Vous êtes un pays charitable avec un endroit doux pour mounties. Pas le projet sur envahir n'importe qui n'importe quand bientôt, mais être heureux -- vie bonne et gens apprécient partout un Etat-providence.

For your information, the possible countries in this test include: Haiti, North Korea, Albania, Russia, Vietnam, Turkey, Poland, India, Singapore, China, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Libya, Tanzania, East Timor, Lithuania, Indonesia, Iran, Canada, Israel, Sweden, Australia, Germany, or the United States of America.




My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 59% on morals
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 36% on prosperity
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 49% on liberalness
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 12% on aggression
Link: The What country are you? Test written by cactusoftheeast on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test
< hit counters
Dell Coupons